You are currently browsing the THE TALBOT FAMILY - keeping in touch! weblog archives for April, 2009.
- Blogroll (1)
- Family Anniversaries (9)
- Family Chat (525)
- Family web sites (1)
- Fly on the wall (4)
- FLYING THE FLAG (10)
- From Seth (2)
- HOW TO ……… (4)
- MORE NEWS (3)
- NEWS ABOUT MUM (88)
- THE PROMISE BOX (2)
FAMILY MATTERS
WHO ARE WE?
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
Archive for April 2009
Food for thought!
30/04/2009 by Ted.
Bell’s Theorem To The Art Bell Effect
By Jan Mirehiel
In Quantum Physics much has been made over the staggering implications of a theorem that forces physicists to consider that the entire notion of a purely objective world is in conflict, not only with the theory of quantum mechanics, but also with the facts as shown in actual experiments. These findings point insistently to a profound interaction between conscious mental activity and the physical world itself.
THE MYSTIC’S VISION
The mystic’s vision of a world in which man participates in a seamless existence, indivisibly united with the universe around him, is no different from that put forth in1964 by the physicist John S. Bell. His theorem, subsequently confirmed by experiment in 1972 by Professor John Clauser at Berkley, and by others since, has had an enormous impact on the physics community.1 In its most simple form, Bell’s Theorem states:
“If the statistical predictions of quantum theory are true, an objective universe is incompatible with the law of local causes.”
Professor Henry Stapp, a physicist at Berkley and an authority on the implications of Bell’s Theorem, has called it “the most important discovery in the history of science.
Although formidable at first glance, Bell’s Theorem seems simpler once key terms are understood. First, an “objective universe” is simply one that exists apart from our consciousness. Secondly, the “law of local causes” refers to the fact that events in the universe happen at a speed that does not exceed the speed of light. This limitation, imposed by Einstein’s special theory of relativity, is a mainstay of modern physical theory.
In 1935, Albert Einstein, together with Nathan Rosen and Boris Podolsky proposed through flawless mathematical reasoning that if the quantum theory were correct, then ‘A change in the spin of one particle in a two particle system would affect its twin simultaneously, even if the two had been widely separated in the meantime’.
Simultaneous is a dirty word in the theory of special relativity, which forbids the transmission of any signal faster than the speed of light.
Obviously, a signal telling the other particle ‘what to do’ would have to travel faster than the speed of light if instantaneous changes occurred in the distant particle.
The dilemma into which Einstein, Rosen and Podolsky dragged the quantum theory was a profound one, that came to be known as the ERP Effect, after the three of them. When Bell’s Theorem emerged it indicated that their impossible proposition might in fact hold true.
Clauser’s confirmation of the “statistical predictions of quantum mechanics”, used an elaborate system involving photons, calcite crystals, and photo multiplier tubes The same experiment has since been run several times with the same consistent results. Bell’s Theorem stands solid.
THE IMPLICATIONS OF BELL’S THEOREM
Even for the physicists involved, the implications of Bell’s Theorem are practically unthinkable. Mathematics and experimentation have taken us where our logical mind cannot go. Slowly, new ideas are emerging to explain these “impossible” occurrences.
One view is that, in some unexplainable way, the particles are still in contact although separated in space. This is the suggestion of the French physicist Bernard D’Espagnat. In 1979, writing about quantum reality, he said that “the entire notion of an external, fixed, objective world now lies in conflict not only with quantum theory, but in facts drawn from actual experiments…. in some sense all these objects constitute an indivisible whole.”
Physicist Jack Sarfatti of the Physics/Consciousness Research Group proposes that it is ‘information’ rather than an actual energy-requiring signal that is transmitted between the distant objects. Thus no violation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity occurs. It is not exactly, however, clear what this information is other than some strange thing which might travel instantly and require no energy to do so.
Nic Herbert, a physicist who heads the C-Life Institute, suggests that we have merely discovered an elemental oneness of the world. This oneness cannot be diminished by spatial separation. An invisible wholeness unites the objects that are given birth in the universe, and it is this wholeness that we have stumbled into through modern experimental methods. Herbert alludes to the words of the poet Charles Williams: “Separation without separateness, reality without rift.”
It would be a mistake to suppose that these effects are relevant only to the invisible world of the atom. Professor Stapp states that the real importance of these findings is that they translate directly to our microcosmic existence, implying that there is a oneness implicit in Bell’s Theorem which envelopes human beings and atoms alike.
The interrelation of human consciousness and the observed world is obvious in Bell’s Theorem. Human consciousness and the physical world cannot be regarded as distinct, separate entities. What we call physical reality, the external world, is shaped - to some extent - by human thought. The lesson is clear; we cannot separate our own existence from that of the world outside. We are intimately associated, not only with the earth we inhabit, but with the farthest reaches of the cosmos.
THE HOLOGRAM
Certain quantum physicists now say that each part of the universe contains all the information present in the entire cosmos itself (similar to a giant oak tree producing an acorn that contains all the information to replicate itself). This assertion is so audacious that it would be dismissed out of hand were it not that its chief proponent, David Bohm, a former associate of Einstein, and professor of theoretical physics at Birbeck College of the University of London, is regarded as one of the pre-eminent theoretical physicists of our day.
Bohm maintains that the information of the entire universe is contained in each of its parts. There is, he says, a stunning example of this principle in photography: the hologram (literally whole message).
A hologram is a specially constructed image which, when illuminated by a laser beam, seems eerily suspended in three-dimensional space. The most incredible feature of holograms is that any piece of it, if illuminated with coherent light, provides an image of the entire hologram. The information of the whole is contained in each part. The entire representation of the original object is contained in each portion of the hologram. This principle, says Bohm, extends to the universe at large, that the universe is constructed on the same principles as the hologram.
For Bohm, order and unity are spread throughout the universe in a way that escapes our senses. Each part of the universe contains enough information to reconstitute the whole. The form and structure of the entire universe is enfolded within each part.
Many working physicists say that these concepts are inescapable conclusions that flow from quantum mechanics and relativity. It is crucial to appreciate the scope of these implications. We frequently assume that quantum physics applies only to the diminutive realm of nature - electrons, protons etc., while relativity has only to do with massive objects of cosmic proportions -stars, galaxies, nebulae etc. But Bohm’s contention is that we are squarely in the middle all of these phenomena. Ultimately, the entire universe has to be understood as a single undivided whole, in which analysis into separately and independently existent parts has no fundamental status.
What are the implications of a holographic universe? As part of the universe, do we have holographic features ourselves that allow us to comprehend a holographic universe? This question has been answered affirmatively by Stanford neurophysiologist, Karl Pribram. who has proposed the hologram is a model brain function. In essence, he views the brain as the ‘photographic plate’ on which information in the universe is encoded.
When the proposals of Bohm and Pribram are conceptually joined, a new model of man emerges, using a brain that encodes information holographically; and is itself a hologram of an even larger hologram - the universe and beyond.
SPACE AND TIME - THE HOLOVERSE
This indivisibility also applies fundamentally to space and time. Relativity has shown that they are inextricably linked, and cannot be teased apart.
Recall that one of the possibilities embodied in Bell’s theorem involves the non-local features of the universe: objects once in contact, though separated spatially, and placed at distant ends of the universe, are somehow remain in contact. Since any change in one immediately causes change in the other, this is called a non local occurrence, meaning that information passing between the two objects must travel faster than the speed of light.
Since, according to the special theory of relativity, it is impossible for energy to exceed the speed of light, this event is said to be noncausal- i.e. not caused by the transfer of any conceivable kind of energy passing between the distant objects.
Although these nonlocal and noncausal descriptions are applied to objects separated in space, Bohm states that the implications of quantum theory also apply to moments in ‘TIME’. What is crucial is that, according to the theory of relativity, there can be no sharp distinction made between space and time.
Indeed, astounding evidence of this truth has resulted from Princeton Engineering’s research into the field of global consciousness, and from the outcomes associated with the informal audience directives given by Art Bell and George Noory, to their large radio talk show audience
Ultimately, we are all connected through our roots in the universe. Our conscious mental activity exerts measurable effects on the physical world - a world that includes human bodies, organs, tissues, and cells. Mind becomes a legitimate factor in the unfolding of health and disease. The inter-penetration of all matter is the rule. The dividing line between life and non-life, consciousness and nonconsciousness is illusory and arbitrary.
There is only one valid way, thus, to partake of the universe and that way must be characterized by gratitude for participation in a universe of kinship with all others and with all matter. A reverential attitude that speaks of this oneness with the universe transforms the most common act into a sacrament. One who obtains this attitude will know what it means to experience the bliss of The Harmonic Concordance Moment, now.
1. To be accurate, in actual experimental situations, it is not Bell’s Theorem that is tested, but the predictions of Quantum Mechanics.
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »
Sorry Richard!
25/04/2009 by Pat.
Richard, I’m most awfully sorry mate. I have only just noticed your enquiry about Letitia and Rabies. Got a bit carried away with all the funny goings on that have been blogged just lately. Anyway, my deepest apologies for the oversight. It was not deliberate, I assure you, and thanks for the thought.
They are both well - I think Rabies is a little ahead on points as he tends to get a bit more attention by virtue of trying to kick the door down when he wants to go out. He does that several times a day, and I don’t think it does Letitia’s nerves any good at all. But she is alright. Doesn’t say much but keeps busy doing this and that as good little sheilas are supposed to.
Glad to see that you and your clan are OK too. Please give them my regards.
Sounds a bit tough over there in the UK just now. Look after yourself and keep your peckers up all of you.
Be good,
Pat.
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »
Smart dog!
24/04/2009 by Pat.
Hi Ted,
I dropped into the bar the other evening with Rabies for a bit of lubrication. There were three men and a dog at a table playing cards.
“Smart dog!”, I said as I passed.
“He’s not so smart”, said one man. “Every time he gets a good hand he wags his tail!”
Well, you can believe it or not,
God bless,
Pat.
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »
Another from St. George’s?
23/04/2009 by Ted.
The doctor had been doing a routine check-up on old Bill. Afterwards he spoke to the senior care assistant.
“I’m a bit worried about old Bill”, he said. “He says that God puts the light on for him every time he goes to the toilet and then puts it off again when he comes out. Do you think that his mind is going?”
“Naaa!”, replied the carer. “He’s been peeing in the fridge again!”
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »
No vacancies at UK holiday camps
22/04/2009 by Pat.
The man walked up to the counter.
“A plate of mashed potatoes, please”, he said.
The assistant smiled at him.
“You must be Irish”, she remarked.
“I resent your remark”, protested the man. “It is against the law and is racially abusive. If I came in here and asked for a haggis would you assume that I am a Scotsman?”
“No”, said the assistant.
“And if I came into here and asked for spaghetti would I have to be Italian?”
“No”, said the assistant.
“Then why is it right for you you to assume that I am Irish just because I ask for a plate of mashed potato?”, stormed the man.
“Because this is a hairdressers”, smiled the assistant.
(PS. Over there in the UK you can probably be arrested for laughing at this joke!)
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »
Bran Flakes
13/04/2009 by James.
The couple were 85 years old and had been married for sixty years. Though they were far from rich, they managed to get by because they watched their pennies.
Though not young, they were both in very good health, largely due to the wife’s insistence on healthy foods and exercise for the last decade.
One day, their good health didn’t help when they went on a rare vacation and their plane crashed, sending them off to Heaven.
They reached the pearly gates, and St. Peter escorted them inside. He took them to a beautiful mansion, furnished in gold and fine silks, with a fully stocked kitchen and a waterfall in the master bath. A maid could be seen hanging their favourite clothes in the closet.
They gasped in astonishment when he said, ‘Welcome to Heaven. This will be your home now.’
The old man asked Peter how much all this was going to cost. ’Why, nothing,’ Peter replied, ‘remember, this is your reward in Heaven.’
The old man looked out the window and right there he saw a championship golf course, finer and more beautiful than any ever built on Earth.
‘What are the greens fees?,’ grumbled the old man.
‘This is heaven,’ St. Peter replied. ’You can play for free, every day.’Next they went to the clubhouse and saw the lavish buffet lunch, with every imaginable cuisine laid out before them, from seafood to steaks to exotic deserts, free flowing beverages.‘Don’t even ask,’ said St. Peter to the man. This is Heaven, it is all free for you to enjoy.’
The old man looked around and glanced nervously at his wife.
‘Well, where are the low fat and low cholesterol foods and the decaffeinated tea?,’ he asked.
That’s the best part,’ St. Peter replied. ’You can eat and drink as much as you like of whatever you like and you will never get fat or sick..
This is Heaven!’
The old man pushed, ‘No gym to work out at?’
‘Not unless you want to,’ was the answer.
‘No testing my sugar or blood pressure or….’
‘Never again. All you do here is enjoy yourself.’
The old man glared at his wife and said, ‘You and your Bran Flakes. We could have been here ten years ago!’
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »
Greetings from Worcester
11/04/2009 by Richard.
Wishing all the family a very happy Easter. We hope this finds you all in the best of health.We down here are all very well apart from Linda who seems to be in the habit of breaking her ribs(this is the umpteenth time that she has done so).Still if thats as bad as it gets I’m sure that she will live with it.
Our little Nathan is still his usual happy self,and looking forward to his easter eggs.All he ever wants to do is play football with Jacob (Rebeccas dog)in the garden.They are the best of friends.
Nice to hear from you Pat.Hows the wife and the pet joey both well I hope.
Well it’s time for my bed now as I was working last night
love to all
Richard Linda & family
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »
Hi Ted
04/04/2009 by Pat.
Had a chuckle about Bill and Amy.
Reminded me of the time when my mum was here too. She was getting pretty old and unstable so we admitted her to a care home and I used to visit her as often as I could.
I remember going one day and she was lying on the bed fast asleep having a nap. I didn’t disturb her. I had my paper so I read that till she wakened. She had a bowl on her bedside table nearly filled with peanuts - a particular favourite of mine. Anyway, to cut a long story short I helped myself to one ot two peanuts being sure that she wouldn’t mind as I read my paper. Eventually when I dipped my hand in for another peanut I realised that there were none left - I had scoffed the lot, so when she awoke I had to apologise. She said, “Don’t worry son. I left them there because I’m not fond of the peanuts once I have sucked the chocolate off “. Euk!!! I know she was my mum, but the thought ………!!! Anyway she has passed on now but I still miss her a lot. Still that’s life, eh?
Had another chuckle the other day too. I was walking by the river and I saw a bloke on the opposite bank. I wanted to cross the river but hadn’t a clue as to where there was a bridge, so I shouted across to him “How do I get to the other side?” - and he shouted back, “You are on the other side!” Cool eh? Never did find the bridge either.
Anyway, must go.
Speak to you soon,
All the best, Pat.
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »
Recollections of St George’s
01/04/2009 by Ted.
Hi Pat, nice to hear from you and thanks for the posts. Keep up the good work!
Your today’s post brought the following amusing recollection to mind.
One afternoon old Bill leaned across to Amy in St. George’s dayroom.
“How old am I?” he asked her anxiously.
“Take off your clothes and bend down and I will tell you”, Amy replied.
Bill did as he was told.
“Eighty-four”, Amy said firmly.
Bill looked at her wide-eyed. “How do you know that?”, he asked.
“You told me yesterday”, smiled Amy.
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »
Breaking news
01/04/2009 by Pat.
Ireland’s worst air disaster occurred early this morning when a small two-seater Cessna plane crashed into a cemetery. Irish search and rescue workers have recovered 1,826 bodies so far and expect the number to climb as digging continues.
Posted in Family Chat | No Comments »